Question

Following his arrest after a valid buy-bust operation, Tommy was convicted of violation of Section 5, Republic Act No. 9165. On appeal, Tommy questioned the admissibility of the evidence because the police officers who conducted the buy-bust operation failed to observe the requisite "chain of custody" of the evidence confiscated and/or seized from him.

(a) What is the "chain of custody" requirement in drug offenses? What is its rationale?

(b) What is the effect of failure to observe the requirement? (2016, 2009 BAR)

0/1500
5:00
Skip